TrueBlueArmy Forums

Live on Talk Sport 2 Now.

Thanks!

1-0

Bloody typical isn't it. Who was saying its even worse that they play better against the good teams? Where was this hunger against the shitters in the league, when it was actually needed?

(12-04-2022, 07:42 PM)Pedalo_menders Wrote: [ -> ]Bloody typical isn't it. Who was saying its even worse that they play better against the good teams? Where was this hunger against the shitters in the league, when it was actually needed?

That were me. You don't get extra points for beating the better teams. VERY frustrating. Not helped by picking a weakened team. This back four really give us a proper base to win games from. To be honest forget wingbacks.

(12-04-2022, 07:45 PM)Hammie Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-04-2022, 07:42 PM)Pedalo_menders Wrote: [ -> ]Bloody typical isn't it. Who was saying its even worse that they play better against the good teams? Where was this hunger against the shitters in the league, when it was actually needed?

That were me. You don't get extra points for beating the better teams. VERY frustrating. Not helped by picking a weakened team. This back four really give us a proper base to win games from. To be honest forget wingbacks.

Good job we haven’t bought a wing back who can’t defend then…..

if we had played this back four week in week out....
if only....
very frustrating
VERY FRUSTRATING

AAAAGHHHH!

(12-04-2022, 08:23 PM)Hammie Wrote: [ -> ]if we had played this back four week in week out....
if only....
very frustrating
VERY FRUSTRATING

AAAAGHHHH!

We played the back four on Saturday and were shyte. It's the way they play on the day that matters, not the formation they play .  We have had two good unbeaten runs this season playing with three at the back.  Both formations are equally acceptable IMO.

Was it the same back four? I could only listen, not watch on Saturday, know Romeo was playing for example, so had assumed he was in as wing back?