They started each half very well, I thought, and played some neat and incisive football, which made it look pretty ominous when they went ahead. They were winning most of the 50-50s. Goals aren't normally easy to score, and going behind so early made it seem a very uphill task if they continued at that level. But they didn't, we gradually settled and had several near misses. In the final quarter of the game they seemed to lose their shape quite a bit and were pumping long balls upfield in a way they had not done earlier in the game. Raggett and Morrison dealt with those relatively comfortably. Overall our goal efforts came much closer than Peterborough's, quite a lot of their possession came from playing it around at the back, and as others have noted, we scored twice, they just the once. They were a good team, for sure, but better? Not overall on the game as a whole.
