15-03-2022, 11:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 15-03-2022, 11:54 AM by Isaac Hunt.)
(15-03-2022, 11:38 AM)DeepBlue Wrote:(15-03-2022, 11:31 AM)Isaac Hunt Wrote: Just as an aside.
When we are rating players what would the score be for ADEQUATE 5 or 6 or 7 ?
The normal interpretation in the papers is that 7 is 'par' - did his job, nothing wrong but did nothing spectacular. As in a consistent player is described as he always gives you 7 out 10 .. i always thought Lee Brown was the nearest we had to one of those (most weeks anyway).
But whether that is the same as 'adequate' is another debate.
For me 6 is ok for adequate as it gives more scope to score 7,8 or 9 for better than adequate performances.
Mind you, when did we have a 9 performance maybe a Baz or a Rags