14-06-2023, 06:36 PM
(14-06-2023, 06:24 PM)Pompeyg100 Wrote:(14-06-2023, 02:35 PM)Roybatty Wrote: Surely arsenal would have had a sell on clause inserted in the deal?
We didn’t buy him did we?
It would probably cost them more in ink to have the clause than they would make from it.
We paid some money for him .. the famous 'undisclosed sum'. But it's very unlikely that Arsenal would have wanted a sell-on clause, and none was reported at the time.
I'd be very surprised if that undisclosed sum reached 6 figures so if we were offered 250k it could be good business. As long as he is replaced adequately (or could Mnoga step up?)